" The Washington Post sticks up for the right to convey the subjective vantage points of those involved, says that the only contested statement in its initial report is "substantially true," that other challenged statements don't carry defamatory meaning and were not "of and concerning" Sandmann himself, and finally, seizes upon the invocation of politics in this defamation case."
links
-
-
What I saw and observed on January 6 2021 in Washington DC - * Personally, I did NOT ENCOUNTER any angry, rowdy, people at the rally. They were friendly but passionate about the cause. I didn't make it to the Capit...
-
